I would bet that a select committee is not in the immediate future. I don’t think congress would see the justification for one without being presented with clear goals and strategies for a select committee that would be markedly different than the existing, Intel, Armed Forces, and Homeland Security committees/subcommittees.
I would bet that a select committee is not in the immediate future. I don’t think congress would see the justification for one without being presented with clear goals and strategies for a select committee that would be markedly different than the existing, Intel, Armed Forces, and Homeland Security committees/subcommittees.
If Oversight wants to continue to press the issue (which I think they should) they’ll need Comer to wield more of the committee’s subpoena power, which he hasn’t done so far. I believe they should also focus on the potential fraud, waste and abuse of funds and/or authority that may have resulted from undisclosed programs. They have more arrows in their quiver before requesting a select committee.
I would bet that a select committee is not in the immediate future. I don’t think congress would see the justification for one without being presented with clear goals and strategies for a select committee that would be markedly different than the existing, Intel, Armed Forces, and Homeland Security committees/subcommittees.
If Oversight wants to continue to press the issue (which I think they should) they’ll need Comer to wield more of the committee’s subpoena power, which he hasn’t done so far. I believe they should also focus on the potential fraud, waste and abuse of funds and/or authority that may have resulted from undisclosed programs. They have more arrows in their quiver before requesting a select committee.