That said, I feel this is a misleading headline… it’s Senator Young and Gillibrand’s *opinion* that Schumer’s bill “has nothing to do with UAP whistleblower David Grusch” - in fact neither senator actually uses those words - whereas your headline attempting to paraphrase them, without that qualifier, makes it seem like that’s an establis…
That said, I feel this is a misleading headline… it’s Senator Young and Gillibrand’s *opinion* that Schumer’s bill “has nothing to do with UAP whistleblower David Grusch” - in fact neither senator actually uses those words - whereas your headline attempting to paraphrase them, without that qualifier, makes it seem like that’s an established fact that you, Matt Laslo, are definitively stating.. The numerous references to non-human intelligence and non-human technology in the bill makes it clear it has *everything* to do with what Grusch is claiming (in addition to being about transparency)… it would be interesting to see if Schumer himself shares the same view as Young. The headline would be more accurate if it said something like “Senators say Schumer’s new UAP bill has nothing to do with UFO whistleblower David Grusch“
That said, I feel this is a misleading headline… it’s Senator Young and Gillibrand’s *opinion* that Schumer’s bill “has nothing to do with UAP whistleblower David Grusch” - in fact neither senator actually uses those words - whereas your headline attempting to paraphrase them, without that qualifier, makes it seem like that’s an established fact that you, Matt Laslo, are definitively stating.. The numerous references to non-human intelligence and non-human technology in the bill makes it clear it has *everything* to do with what Grusch is claiming (in addition to being about transparency)… it would be interesting to see if Schumer himself shares the same view as Young. The headline would be more accurate if it said something like “Senators say Schumer’s new UAP bill has nothing to do with UFO whistleblower David Grusch“